Political Theology and SovereigntySayyid Qutb in Our Times

Standard

Political Theology and Sovereignty : Sayyid Qutb in Our Times. / Pasha, Mustapha.

In: Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 22, 01.06.2019, p. 346–363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Pasha, M 2019, 'Political Theology and Sovereignty: Sayyid Qutb in Our Times', Journal of International Relations and Development, vol. 22, pp. 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3

APA

Pasha, M. (2019). Political Theology and Sovereignty: Sayyid Qutb in Our Times. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22, 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3

Vancouver

Pasha M. Political Theology and Sovereignty: Sayyid Qutb in Our Times. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2019 Jun 1;22:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3

Author

Pasha, Mustapha. / Political Theology and Sovereignty : Sayyid Qutb in Our Times. In: Journal of International Relations and Development. 2019 ; Vol. 22. pp. 346–363.

Bibtex - Download

@article{23621a01c05d4d66abf777b689dfa48b,
title = "Political Theology and Sovereignty: Sayyid Qutb in Our Times",
abstract = "This chapter explores the political-theological nature of Sayyid Qutb{\textquoteright}s theoretical design, specifically its relation to non-Western understandings of sovereignty and its principal anomalies arising from the struggle of reconciling the notion of the modern state with undefined territorial imaginings of a religious community. Repudiating reformist variants of modernist Islam, Qutb{\textquoteright}s writings afford an alternate reading of modern sovereignty as it is reconfigured in the language of hakimiyyah (God{\textquoteright}s sovereignty). A political reading of sovereignty in Qutb complicates the assumed separation between political and non-political spheres. The argument recognizes a basic distinction between the idea of sovereignty in a theological sense and its political counterpart. In Qutb{\textquoteright}s design, however, the absence of determinate lines between the theological and the political leaves few autonomous social spheres outside God{\textquoteright}s law. While Qutb{\textquoteright}s vision does not exhaust political Islam–a fairly heterodox field of diverse perspectives and commitments–the appeal of his writings remains forceful, especially under conditions of Islam{\textquoteright}s perceived defensiveness in the face of secularist global modernity and its institutionalized forms.",
keywords = "Political Theology, Sovereignty, modernity, Islam, Qutb, Fundamentalism, International Relations",
author = "Mustapha Pasha",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "346–363",
journal = "Journal of International Relations and Development",
issn = "1408-6980",
publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political Theology and Sovereignty

T2 - Sayyid Qutb in Our Times

AU - Pasha, Mustapha

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - This chapter explores the political-theological nature of Sayyid Qutb’s theoretical design, specifically its relation to non-Western understandings of sovereignty and its principal anomalies arising from the struggle of reconciling the notion of the modern state with undefined territorial imaginings of a religious community. Repudiating reformist variants of modernist Islam, Qutb’s writings afford an alternate reading of modern sovereignty as it is reconfigured in the language of hakimiyyah (God’s sovereignty). A political reading of sovereignty in Qutb complicates the assumed separation between political and non-political spheres. The argument recognizes a basic distinction between the idea of sovereignty in a theological sense and its political counterpart. In Qutb’s design, however, the absence of determinate lines between the theological and the political leaves few autonomous social spheres outside God’s law. While Qutb’s vision does not exhaust political Islam–a fairly heterodox field of diverse perspectives and commitments–the appeal of his writings remains forceful, especially under conditions of Islam’s perceived defensiveness in the face of secularist global modernity and its institutionalized forms.

AB - This chapter explores the political-theological nature of Sayyid Qutb’s theoretical design, specifically its relation to non-Western understandings of sovereignty and its principal anomalies arising from the struggle of reconciling the notion of the modern state with undefined territorial imaginings of a religious community. Repudiating reformist variants of modernist Islam, Qutb’s writings afford an alternate reading of modern sovereignty as it is reconfigured in the language of hakimiyyah (God’s sovereignty). A political reading of sovereignty in Qutb complicates the assumed separation between political and non-political spheres. The argument recognizes a basic distinction between the idea of sovereignty in a theological sense and its political counterpart. In Qutb’s design, however, the absence of determinate lines between the theological and the political leaves few autonomous social spheres outside God’s law. While Qutb’s vision does not exhaust political Islam–a fairly heterodox field of diverse perspectives and commitments–the appeal of his writings remains forceful, especially under conditions of Islam’s perceived defensiveness in the face of secularist global modernity and its institutionalized forms.

KW - Political Theology

KW - Sovereignty

KW - modernity

KW - Islam

KW - Qutb

KW - Fundamentalism

KW - International Relations

U2 - 10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3

DO - 10.1057/s41268-018-0151-3

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 346

EP - 363

JO - Journal of International Relations and Development

JF - Journal of International Relations and Development

SN - 1408-6980

ER -

Show download statistics
View graph of relations
Citation formats