Multiplicity expandedIR theories, multiplicity and the potential of trans-disciplinary dialogue

Authors Organisations
Type Article
Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobalizations
Early online date21 Oct 2019
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Oct 2019
View graph of relations
Citation formats

Abstract

Despite the seeming fragmentation of the field of International Relations (IR), a theoretical common ground - not yet clearly perceived in the field - may in fact exist. Justin Rosenberg suggests that existing IR theories can all be conceived of as theories of 'multiplicity'. This article carefully considers this proposition. It is argued that we may indeed read many IR theories as theories of multiplicity. Yet, in so doing we need to recognize the wide range of - and the contested nature of - perspectives on multiplicity in the field. Crucially, this leads us to conceive of multiplicity in an expanded way, beyond Rosenberg’s notion of ‘societal multiplicity’. Developing this more contested and expanded notion of multiplicity has important implications: for how we perceive IR and its limits in the years to come and, crucially, for the kind of trans-disciplinary dialogues IR scholars will engage with.

Keywords

  • IR theory, multiplicity, inter-/trans-disciplinarity

Documents

  • Multiplicity expanded: IR theories, multiplicity and the potential of trans-disciplinary dialogue

    Accepted author manuscript, 61 KB, DOCX

    Embargo ends: 21 Apr 2020

    Request copy