Local perceptions of the livelihood and conservation benefits of small-scale livelihood projects in rural Madagascar.

Authors Organisations
  • Celia Harvey(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Andoniaina Rambeloson(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Tokihenintsoa Andrianjohaninarivo(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Luciano Andriamaro (Author)
    Conservation International
  • Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Jeannicq Randrianarisoa(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Soloson Ramanahadray(Author)
    Conservation International
  • Michael Christie(Author)
  • Ewa Siwicka(Author)
  • Kyriaki Remoundou(Author)
  • Sergio Vílchez-Mendoza(Author)
    Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center
  • James MacKinnon(Author)
    Haughead
Type Article
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1045-1063
Number of pages19
JournalSociety & Natural Resources
Volume31
Issue number9
Early online date13 Aug 2018
DOI
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2018
Show download statistics
View graph of relations
Citation formats

Abstract

Small-scale livelihood projects are widely used in forest conservation and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD)+ initiatives; however, there is limited information on how effective these projects are at delivering livelihood and conservation benefits. We explored local perceptions of the effectiveness of small-scale livelihood projects in delivering livelihood and conservation benefits in eastern Madagascar. Our results suggest that small-scale livelihood projects vary greatly in their ability to deliver livelihood benefits, and that the type of livelihood project (e.g., agriculture, beekeeping, fish farming, or livestock production) has a significant impact on which livelihood benefits are delivered. Many small-scale livelihood projects, regardless of project type, are perceived to contribute to forest conservation efforts. Our study highlights that small-scale livelihood projects have the potential to contribute to both improved livelihoods and enhanced forest conservation, but also illustrates the need for more information on the factors that lead to project success.

Keywords

  • agriculture, alternative livelihoods, forest conservation, impact evaluation, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+), rural livelihoods