How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review

Standard

How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review. / Marwaha, Steven ; He, Zhimin; Broome, Matthew et al.

In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 9, 07.2014, p. 1793-1808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Marwaha, S, He, Z, Broome, M, Singh, S, Scott, J, Eyden, J & Wolke, D 2014, 'How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review', Psychological Medicine, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1793-1808. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002407

APA

Marwaha, S., He, Z., Broome, M., Singh, S., Scott, J., Eyden, J., & Wolke, D. (2014). How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 44(9), 1793-1808. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002407

Vancouver

Marwaha S, He Z, Broome M, Singh S, Scott J, Eyden J et al. How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine. 2014 Jul;44(9):1793-1808. Epub 2013 Sept 27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002407

Author

Marwaha, Steven ; He, Zhimin ; Broome, Matthew et al. / How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review. In: Psychological Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 9. pp. 1793-1808.

Bibtex - Download

@article{5b526752f9a84eec8e1cbd1336e0814c,
title = "How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review",
abstract = "Affective instability (AI) is poorly defined but considered clinically important. The aim of this study was to examine definitions and measures of AI employed in clinical populations.This study was a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles and Web of Science databases were searched. Also five journals were hand searched. Primary empirical studies involving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after, and observational investigations were included. Studies were selected, data extracted and quality appraised. A narrative synthesis was completed.A total of 11 443 abstracts were screened and 37 studies selected for final analysis on the basis that they provided a definition and measure of AI. Numbers of definitions for each of the terms employed in included studies were: AI (n = 7), affective lability (n = 6), affective dysregulation (n = 1), emotional dysregulation (n = 4), emotion regulation (n = 2), emotional lability (n = 1), mood instability (n = 2), mood lability (n = 1) and mood swings (n = 1); however, these concepts showed considerable overlap in features. A total of 24 distinct measures were identified that could be categorized as primarily measuring one of four facets of AI (oscillation, intensity, ability to regulate and affect change triggered by environment) or as measuring general emotional regulation.A clearer definition of AI is required. We propose AI be defined as {\textquoteleft}rapid oscillations of intense affect, with a difficulty in regulating these oscillations or their behavioural consequences{\textquoteright}. No single measure comprehensively assesses AI and a combination of current measures is required for assessment. A new short measure of AI that is reliable and validated against external criteria is needed",
keywords = "affective instability, dysregulation, mood lability",
author = "Steven Marwaha and Zhimin He and Matthew Broome and Swaran Singh and Jan Scott and Julie Eyden and Dieter Wolke",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1017/S0033291713002407",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1793--1808",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - How is affective instability defined and measured: A systematic review

AU - Marwaha, Steven

AU - He, Zhimin

AU - Broome, Matthew

AU - Singh, Swaran

AU - Scott, Jan

AU - Eyden, Julie

AU - Wolke, Dieter

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Affective instability (AI) is poorly defined but considered clinically important. The aim of this study was to examine definitions and measures of AI employed in clinical populations.This study was a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles and Web of Science databases were searched. Also five journals were hand searched. Primary empirical studies involving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after, and observational investigations were included. Studies were selected, data extracted and quality appraised. A narrative synthesis was completed.A total of 11 443 abstracts were screened and 37 studies selected for final analysis on the basis that they provided a definition and measure of AI. Numbers of definitions for each of the terms employed in included studies were: AI (n = 7), affective lability (n = 6), affective dysregulation (n = 1), emotional dysregulation (n = 4), emotion regulation (n = 2), emotional lability (n = 1), mood instability (n = 2), mood lability (n = 1) and mood swings (n = 1); however, these concepts showed considerable overlap in features. A total of 24 distinct measures were identified that could be categorized as primarily measuring one of four facets of AI (oscillation, intensity, ability to regulate and affect change triggered by environment) or as measuring general emotional regulation.A clearer definition of AI is required. We propose AI be defined as ‘rapid oscillations of intense affect, with a difficulty in regulating these oscillations or their behavioural consequences’. No single measure comprehensively assesses AI and a combination of current measures is required for assessment. A new short measure of AI that is reliable and validated against external criteria is needed

AB - Affective instability (AI) is poorly defined but considered clinically important. The aim of this study was to examine definitions and measures of AI employed in clinical populations.This study was a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles and Web of Science databases were searched. Also five journals were hand searched. Primary empirical studies involving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, controlled before and after, and observational investigations were included. Studies were selected, data extracted and quality appraised. A narrative synthesis was completed.A total of 11 443 abstracts were screened and 37 studies selected for final analysis on the basis that they provided a definition and measure of AI. Numbers of definitions for each of the terms employed in included studies were: AI (n = 7), affective lability (n = 6), affective dysregulation (n = 1), emotional dysregulation (n = 4), emotion regulation (n = 2), emotional lability (n = 1), mood instability (n = 2), mood lability (n = 1) and mood swings (n = 1); however, these concepts showed considerable overlap in features. A total of 24 distinct measures were identified that could be categorized as primarily measuring one of four facets of AI (oscillation, intensity, ability to regulate and affect change triggered by environment) or as measuring general emotional regulation.A clearer definition of AI is required. We propose AI be defined as ‘rapid oscillations of intense affect, with a difficulty in regulating these oscillations or their behavioural consequences’. No single measure comprehensively assesses AI and a combination of current measures is required for assessment. A new short measure of AI that is reliable and validated against external criteria is needed

KW - affective instability

KW - dysregulation

KW - mood lability

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/2160/44027

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291713002407

DO - 10.1017/S0033291713002407

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1793

EP - 1808

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 9

ER -

View graph of relations
Citation formats