Evolving Controllers for Real Robots: A Survey of the Literature
Standard
Evolving Controllers for Real Robots: A Survey of the Literature. / Walker, Joanne Heather; Garrett, Simon Martin; Wilson, Myra Scott.
In: Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2003, p. 179-203.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolving Controllers for Real Robots: A Survey of the Literature
AU - Walker, Joanne Heather
AU - Garrett, Simon Martin
AU - Wilson, Myra Scott
N1 - Walker,J. and Garrett,S. and Wilson,M.S., 'Evolving Controllers for Real Robots: A Survey of the Literature', Adaptive Behavior, 2003, volume 11, number 3, pp 179--203, Sage
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - For many years, researchers in the field of mobile robotics have been investigating the use of genetic and evolutionary computation (GEC) to aid the development of mobile robot controllers. Alongside the fundamental choices of the GEC mechanism and its operators, which apply to both simulated and physical evolutionary robotics, other issues have emerged which are specific to the application of GEC to physical mobile robotics. This paper presents a survey of recent methods in GEC-developed mobile robot controllers, focusing on those methods that include a physical robot at some point in the learning loop. It simultaneously relates each of these methods to a framework of two orthogonal issues: the use of a simulated and/or a physical robot, and the use of finite, training phase evolution prior to a task and/or lifelong adaptation by evolution during a task. A list of evaluation criteria are presented and each of the surveyed methods are compared to them. Analyses of the framework and evaluation criteria suggest several possibilities; however, there appear to be particular advantages in combining simulated, training phase evolution (TPE) with lifelong adaptation by evolution (LAE) on a physical robot.
AB - For many years, researchers in the field of mobile robotics have been investigating the use of genetic and evolutionary computation (GEC) to aid the development of mobile robot controllers. Alongside the fundamental choices of the GEC mechanism and its operators, which apply to both simulated and physical evolutionary robotics, other issues have emerged which are specific to the application of GEC to physical mobile robotics. This paper presents a survey of recent methods in GEC-developed mobile robot controllers, focusing on those methods that include a physical robot at some point in the learning loop. It simultaneously relates each of these methods to a framework of two orthogonal issues: the use of a simulated and/or a physical robot, and the use of finite, training phase evolution prior to a task and/or lifelong adaptation by evolution during a task. A list of evaluation criteria are presented and each of the surveyed methods are compared to them. Analyses of the framework and evaluation criteria suggest several possibilities; however, there appear to be particular advantages in combining simulated, training phase evolution (TPE) with lifelong adaptation by evolution (LAE) on a physical robot.
KW - evolutionary robotics
KW - physical robots
KW - simulation
KW - training
KW - lifelong adaptation by evolution
U2 - 10.1177/1059712303113003
DO - 10.1177/1059712303113003
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 179
EP - 203
JO - Adaptive Behavior
JF - Adaptive Behavior
SN - 1059-7123
IS - 3
ER -