Managing forests for global and local ecosystem services:A case study of carbon, water and livelihoods from eastern Indonesia
Standard
Managing forests for global and local ecosystem services: A case study of carbon, water and livelihoods from eastern Indonesia. / Kim, Yeon-Su; Latifah, Sitti; Afifi, Mansur et al.
Yn: Ecosystem Services, Cyfrol 31, Rhif Part A, 30.06.2018, t. 153-168.Allbwn ymchwil: Cyfraniad at gyfnodolyn › Erthygl › adolygiad gan gymheiriaid
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Managing forests for global and local ecosystem services:
T2 - A case study of carbon, water and livelihoods from eastern Indonesia
AU - Kim, Yeon-Su
AU - Latifah, Sitti
AU - Afifi, Mansur
AU - Mulligan, Mark
AU - Burk, Sophia
AU - Fisher, Larry
AU - Siwicka, Ewa
AU - Remoundou, Kyriaki
AU - Christie, Michael
AU - Masek Lopez, Sharon
AU - Jenness, Jeff
PY - 2018/6/30
Y1 - 2018/6/30
N2 - Despite a recent increase of interest in global payment for ecosystem services (PES) mechanisms, there has been little comprehensive assessment of PES impacts on ecosystem services (ESs) at smaller scales. Better understanding of localized impacts of global PES can help balance ES deliveries for global benefits with those for meeting landscape and local level needs. Using a case study from eastern Indonesia, we assessed trade-offs and potential synergies between global PES (e.g. REDD+ for forest carbon) and landscape level ESs (e.g., water quantity, quality, regulation) and local ESs (e.g. forest products for food, energy, livelihoods). Realistic land use change scenarios and potential carbon credits were estimated based on historical land use changes and in-depth interviews with stakeholders. We applied a process-based hydrologic model to estimate changes in watershed services due to land use changes. Finally, local community’s forest uses were surveyed to understand locally realized ESs. The results show empirical evidence that, without careful consideration of local impacts, a PES mechanism to protect global ESs can have negative consequences for local ecosystem services. We present management alternatives designed to maximize positive synergies between different ESs at varying scales.
AB - Despite a recent increase of interest in global payment for ecosystem services (PES) mechanisms, there has been little comprehensive assessment of PES impacts on ecosystem services (ESs) at smaller scales. Better understanding of localized impacts of global PES can help balance ES deliveries for global benefits with those for meeting landscape and local level needs. Using a case study from eastern Indonesia, we assessed trade-offs and potential synergies between global PES (e.g. REDD+ for forest carbon) and landscape level ESs (e.g., water quantity, quality, regulation) and local ESs (e.g. forest products for food, energy, livelihoods). Realistic land use change scenarios and potential carbon credits were estimated based on historical land use changes and in-depth interviews with stakeholders. We applied a process-based hydrologic model to estimate changes in watershed services due to land use changes. Finally, local community’s forest uses were surveyed to understand locally realized ESs. The results show empirical evidence that, without careful consideration of local impacts, a PES mechanism to protect global ESs can have negative consequences for local ecosystem services. We present management alternatives designed to maximize positive synergies between different ESs at varying scales.
KW - ecosystem services
KW - carbon
KW - REDD+
KW - watershed services
KW - livelihoods
KW - Indonesia
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.018
M3 - Article
VL - 31
SP - 153
EP - 168
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
SN - 2212-0416
IS - Part A
ER -